Current use cases proposed to be supported by the NPU-SNOMED ontology (copied from recent presentation)
- Interoperability
- This presents both strong and weak arguments. It is compelling for informatics professionals but requires additional justification for management stakeholders.
- It facilitates the establishment of a “bridge” between LOINC and NPU, enabling related concepts to be identified through SCT.
- It enhances the comprehensibility of NPU concepts in countries not utilizing NPU, a factor particularly relevant within the context of the European Health Data Space (EHDS).
- This presents both strong and weak arguments. It is compelling for informatics professionals but requires additional justification for management stakeholders.
- Sustainability of the NPU Terminology
- Given the substantial investment spanning 30 years in the Nomenclature of Properties and Units (NPU), transitioning to LOINC would impose considerable economic and quality-related costs.
- Streamlined Tooling
- Adoption of SCT tools, which are already in place, would simplify the maintenance process by eliminating the need for specialized NPU-specific tools.
- Market Expansion for Laboratory Information Systems
- Aligning with SCT, a globally recognized information model, would potentially expand market opportunities for laboratory information systems.
- Quality Enhancement of the Nomenclature of Properties and Units (NPU)
- Undertaking this exercise would significantly improve the quality and clarity of the NPU by identifying errors and refining concepts for greater explicitness.