But then again you have to be careful not to get a duplicate with 365898008 |Finding related to ability to remember name of current prime minister (finding)| 
1 Like
Oh - wow 
Maybe get rid of both and keep only “head of state”. I like that proposal, then you can also remember the name of your dictator and keep being polite about it.
4 Likes
242938008 |Injury due to legal intervention, struck with cane (disorder)|, 242939000 |Injury due to legal intervention, struck with whip (disorder)| and cousins.
Do I need to say anything?
2 Likes
Definitely not international concepts…
These may have originated from ICD-10 but are compatible with the current ICD-11 External causes of morbidity or mortality reporting codes:
Well, if injury due to legal intevention = injury done by the police for example in the course of the dispersion of a protest, it’s pretty much useful internationaly but “struck with a cane”? Who nowadays still strikes with a cane? Sounds XIXth century. Taserized, clubbed with a truncheon or hit by a rubber bullet I’d understand better.
I think it’s wise to keep a classification distinct from a terminology. Does a clinician deem an action legal or not?
This is a discussion rather like the one I had about child abuse. Different legal systems have different laws and required actions, and those are not international systems.
Usually we can agree on the top levels of the taxonomy, but the lower levels should be national concepts, not international. With some exceptions as the police can use som legal force in confrontations and the baton, electric shock gun, hand cuffs and such would be used and legal in all or most countries around the world.
Maybe we need to set a cut off point on several of these items we have identified as to where the international interest ceases, and different national examples start to appear. It is the latter ones that I would like to move to a national language reference set.
The subject matter experts for NCPT in Sweden highlighted teo concepts that they say are to vague to be applied in Sweden, that is - no directly corresponding swedish translation.
When I worked with translations for real estate companies, these were used with Swedish translations and it worked in that context, so this could be an example of when a definition would clarify what this means in this context.
| 224809004 |Housing estate (environment)| |
|----|
| 272497004 |Residential environment (environment) |
Housing estate seems to be a UK term. I would also classify this one as not international.
The meaning of 272497004 |Residential environment (environment) | however vague, can be understood from its place as a group header of all types of homes a subject can live in.
Some of these subtypes, however, are listed above in this post.
Yes, for Swedish we use “bostadsområde” for Housing estate so this is solved in our langauge, but not sure if all languages has the same kind of grouper term.
But residential environment is so wide. One source (not the best) had the definition: Residential environment means a facility building or any portion of a facility building that is used for living, sleeping, counseling, dining, or academic purposes. In Swedish that is “bostadsmiljö”, or “boendemiljö”, literally word-by-word-translation.