# Review of content for NCPT Reference Set – Pilot Phase **URL:** \ **Category:** Nutrition and Dietetic CRG\ **Tags:** closed\ **Created:** [October 7, 2025, 8:07am UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428 "2025-10-07T08:07:41Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 9\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![ewooler](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/ewooler/32/159_2.png) [@ewooler](https://forums.snomed.org/u/ewooler)\ **Post date:** [October 7, 2025, 8:07am UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/1 "2025-10-07T08:07:41Z")
Dear Colleagues, As part of our ongoing work to update the NCPT Reference Set, we are beginning a review of SNOMED CT concepts relating to _Nutrition assessment, monitoring and evaluation_. We have prepared an initial list of 100 concepts which we would like you to review as a **pilot for the process**. You can download and work on this at your convenience via the following link: [SNOMED CT NCPT Refset Content Review Batch 1](https://conf.spaces.snomed.org/wiki/download/attachments/133732411/SNOMED%20CT%20NCPT%20Refset%20Content%20Review%20Batch%201.xlsx?api=v2) The purpose of this step is to ensure that the content remains appropriate for inclusion in the reference set. Please take a look at the concepts and let us know **via a reply to this forum post:** - If you are happy with the content as proposed. - If you have any specific concerns about the addition of particular concepts. To keep us on track, we would appreciate your feedback by **20 October 2025**. After the pilot, if the approach is acceptable, we plan to divide CRG members into small groups (2–3 people) to review subsequent sections of the proposed reference set. Your input at this stage is vital to shaping a robust and practical reference set. Thank you for your time and contribution. Elaine and Tina ---
**Author:** ![icacciottolo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/848f3c/32.png) [@icacciottolo](https://forums.snomed.org/u/icacciottolo)\ **Post date:** [October 8, 2025, 5:22am UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/2 "2025-10-08T05:22:09Z")
Dear Elaine and Tina The list looks fine from my end as a GP. Ivan ---
**Author:** ![cpapoutsakis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/43a26b/32.png) [@cpapoutsakis](https://forums.snomed.org/u/cpapoutsakis)\ **Post date:** [November 5, 2025, 8:07pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/3 "2025-11-05T20:07:50Z")
Dear all, I had a chance to review these 100 concepts, and they look good to go as is, thank you! ---
**Author:** ![aelshikieri](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ebca7d/32.png) [@aelshikieri](https://forums.snomed.org/u/aelshikieri)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2025, 10:17am UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/4 "2025-11-08T10:17:12Z")
Dear All, I have reviewed the concepts. They are not overlapping. ---
**Author:** ![pdiaque](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/5e9695/32.png) [@pdiaque](https://forums.snomed.org/u/pdiaque)\ **Post date:** [November 8, 2025, 7:19pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/5 "2025-11-08T19:19:43Z")
Hi All My one question would be, why there are a few terms that use “quantity of intake” and the rest just “intake”. For example: Estimated quantity of intake of energy vs Estimated intake of energy per kilogram in 24 hours. Thanks! ---
**Author:** ![YlvaO](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/c2a13f/32.png) [@YlvaO](https://forums.snomed.org/u/YlvaO)\ **Post date:** [November 12, 2025, 6:42am UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/6 "2025-11-12T06:42:39Z")
Hi, i have reviewed the terms and it looks good to me. Thanks! ---
**Author:** ![annatina](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/3ec8ea/32.png) [@annatina](https://forums.snomed.org/u/annatina)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2025, 1:33pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/7 "2025-11-13T13:33:38Z")
Hi there, the Austrian dietetic association has reviewed the proposed refset and is perfectly fine with it. Thank you and KR, Annatina ---
**Author:** ![cpapoutsakis](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/43a26b/32.png) [@cpapoutsakis](https://forums.snomed.org/u/cpapoutsakis)\ **Post date:** [November 13, 2025, 4:28pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/8 "2025-11-13T16:28:37Z")
Dear Paula and all, the one set of terms is older content (just “intake”) than the other (“quantity of intake”). We typically leave older terms alone until there is an editorial QA project. Let me know if you have more questions. Tina ---
**Author:** ![sstovelorentzen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/45deac/32.png) [@sstovelorentzen](https://forums.snomed.org/u/sstovelorentzen)\ **Post date:** [November 17, 2025, 7:41pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/review-of-content-for-ncpt-reference-set-pilot-phase/428/9 "2025-11-17T19:41:40Z")
Sorry late respons. I have reviewed. I have some questions which can be adressed tonight 🙂