# Left/right eye and wet AMD and laterality in general

**URL:** <https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504>\
**Category:** Using SNOMED CT\
**Created:** [October 14, 2025, 1:37pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504 "2025-10-14T13:37:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 10\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vhuser](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/vhuser/32/323_2.png) [@vhuser](https://forums.snomed.org/u/vhuser)\
**Post date:** [October 14, 2025, 1:37pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/1 "2025-10-14T13:37:20Z")

</div>

We have left and right blindness

274571007 |Blind left eye (disorder)|

For wet AMD (macular degeneration), I plan to submit request for left and right eye terms for

414173003 |Exudative age-related macular degeneration|

[https://browser.ihtsdotools.org/?perspective=full&conceptId1=414173003&edition=MAIN&release=&languages=en](https://browser.ihtsdotools.org/?perspective=full&conceptId1=414173003&edition=MAIN&release=&languages=en)

Similarly to blindness in certain eye, it is crucial to record which eye has wet AMD.

Similarly for 230509007 |Non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (disorder)|

For production use of SNOMED CT, we can’t live without having a precoordinated term for lateral specific eye conditions where ICD1x (10 or 11) has left and right eye specific codes.

For conditions that progress from one eye to the other (or may worsen in the same eye) (ischemia to the same eye as before) - my submission will bring SNOMED to level where we need it to be.

Is there any high level policy on laterality and diseases. I prefer to be inline with the overall strategy.

(examples of lateral terms existing now)

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/uploads/snomed/original/1X/f36fa2f33eee4fc26de9ab3b071fa3ab8e64b81f.png)

I will target US extension most likely (and international may follow)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jcase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/57b2e6/32.png) [@jcase](https://forums.snomed.org/u/jcase)\
**Post date:** [October 15, 2025, 9:27pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/2 "2025-10-15T21:27:04Z")

</div>

Lateralized procedures and findings are allowed in the International release:

> **[Lateralized Disorder Naming Conventions | SNOMED International Documents](https://docs.snomed.org/snomed-ct-specifications/snomed-ct-editorial-guide/readme/authoring/domain-specific-modeling/clinical-finding-and-disorder/index/lateralized-disorder-naming-conventions)**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vhuser](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/vhuser/32/323_2.png) [@vhuser](https://forums.snomed.org/u/vhuser)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2025, 10:33pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/3 "2025-11-12T22:33:14Z")

</div>

Thank you for reply and clarification.

International edition is our ideal venue.

Request made in US submission system by me yesterday.  
And follow up linked discussion in OHDSI (and OHDSI AI workgroup recently)

link: [OMOP Vocabulary and diagnoses, laterality, ICD, SNOMED - General - OHDSI Forums](https://forums.ohdsi.org/t/omop-vocabulary-and-diagnoses-laterality-icd-snomed/24653)

> **[OMOP Vocabulary and diagnoses, laterality, ICD, SNOMED](https://forums.ohdsi.org/t/omop-vocabulary-and-diagnoses-laterality-icd-snomed/24653)**
>
> At symposium, the issue of left eye vs right eye and a condition was discussed. (after a keynote by Cindy Cai) @cindyxcai (Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION)) If our standard terminology (=terminology that we map to; eg....

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![icacciottolo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/848f3c/32.png) [@icacciottolo](https://forums.snomed.org/u/icacciottolo)\
**Post date:** [November 13, 2025, 8:25am UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/4 "2025-11-13T08:25:30Z")

</div>

We support having lateralization in precoordinated concepts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lfuhrmann](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/a8b319/32.png) [@lfuhrmann](https://forums.snomed.org/u/lfuhrmann)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2025, 1:39pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/5 "2025-11-16T13:39:16Z")

</div>

HI, I’m an ophthalmologist and interop enthusiast, my focus is mostly on openEHR and FHIR but I want any eye care data point to potentially be useable across openEHR, FHIR and OMOP. So just a disclaimer that I’m writing this because I want all of these standards (and and SNOMED of course) to succeed and harmonize in my domain.

@icacciottolo I’m sure the larger implications for this for a domain like eye care have been considerered, is there a documentation of this decision or rule?

@vhuser I absolutely appreciate the effort to push for better representation of eye care concepts in OMOP. Nontheless, this is squarely on the slippery slope to having nearly all concepts in eye care that can relate to one eye be represented with precoordinated laterality, codes, it does not stop at conditions.  
I know these terms can be resolved to the same parent, but this pattern contributes to ambiguity of how snomed is to be used across production systems that handle **primary** data and multiplies the codes needed for further precoordination with concepts where there is truly no other option.

Many of the codes you are suggesting could be taken from the ICD10CM in [this post are](https://forums.ohdsi.org/t/omop-vocabulary-and-diagnoses-laterality-icd-snomed/24653)so general that they will grow to have more children with more precoordinated concepts in the future.

Also, if you want to batch request based on ICD10CM and precoordinate laterality, what is the plan for “laterality unknown” or “bilateral”? It might not be relevant for the purposes of OMOP, but in routine care where patients may simply not recall which of the eyes had a certain diagnosis it certainly can be.

For glaucoma there are already bilateral codes in use:  
347381000119106 | Bilateral acute angle-closure glaucoma (disorder)  
I’m not saying please request everything with bilateral as well, I just want to point at what is right below us on the slippery slope.

> [@vhuser](#):
>
> For production use of SNOMED CT, we can’t live without having a precoordinated term for lateral specific eye conditions where ICD1x (10 or 11) has left and right eye specific codes.

I hope you are not offended but **not being able to live** does strike me as a bit of a dramatization.

Honest question because I’m not an OMOP expert:  
FHIR and openEHR can represent the laterality of a condition as a seperate attributes/data elements - I know the OMOP CDM does not - but do you know if this is a _ **can’t** _ or a _ **won’t** _?

Best Regards,  
Lars

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vhuser](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/vhuser/32/323_2.png) [@vhuser](https://forums.snomed.org/u/vhuser)\
**Post date:** [December 16, 2025, 7:59pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/6 "2025-12-16T19:59:54Z")

</div>

Thank you all for discussion.

Here is follow up on this topic. Above in the thread, we indicated ideally targeting international edition.

As of today, the request was processed. (made in US content request system using batch mode). Thank you !

There is no field/column in CRS for the submitter to indicate edition (international or national).

Q1 **Is there a way to submit content in a national CRS and specify international edition as target edition? How exactly? If it was decided to go to national extension during processing of the request (in absence of desired edition field) - is there a way to appeal that decision before the submission is processed? (once done in national extension, it is more difficult to post-hoc correct it)**

**Q2 What is the process exactly of submitting a promotion of concept from national extension to international edition?**

Q3: Given instructions of (see link below): “ **Requests that meet inclusion criteria for the International Release are addressed by** ….**”. We think our request met those criteria. (needed by more than 1 country) (represented by OHDSI vocabulary WG with international representatives)**

(I also replied to Lars separately)

LINKS:

link to one implemented term:  
[https://browser.ihtsdotools.org/?perspective=full&conceptId1=15633091000119107&edition=MAIN/SNOMEDCT-US&release=&languages=en](https://browser.ihtsdotools.org/?perspective=full&conceptId1=15633091000119107&edition=MAIN/SNOMEDCT-US&release=&languages=en)

pic1

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/uploads/snomed/original/1X/7d4b04a2c215002cf7661897ec25a4511b5bfa5d.png)

guidance is: (from [https://www.snomed.org/change-or-add](https://www.snomed.org/change-or-add). (paste of part of it)

### \*SNOMED CT

Content Request Service\*

_SNOMED International coordinates requests for additions or changes to SNOMED CT through its Members’ National Release Centers (NRCs). For more information about the processes in each country/territory, please access the relevant Member page.  
​  
Members’ NRCs and other authorized users submit requests for additions or changes via the SNOMED CT Content Request Service (CRS). **Requests that meet inclusion criteria for the International Release are addressed by SNOMED International staff**. If a request is declined, a reason and explanation is provided to the requester, who may choose to appeal the decision to the Head of Terminology._

also looked at : chapter 5.3 in [https://www.snomed.org/\_files/ugd/900274\_0588ebe7d1d343158d2ffd52b08d3817.pdf](https://www.snomed.org/_files/ugd/900274_0588ebe7d1d343158d2ffd52b08d3817.pdf)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vhuser](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/vhuser/32/323_2.png) [@vhuser](https://forums.snomed.org/u/vhuser)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2026, 4:51pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/7 "2026-01-02T16:51:50Z")

</div>

@jcase @rdavidson

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jcase](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/57b2e6/32.png) [@jcase](https://forums.snomed.org/u/jcase)\
**Post date:** [January 5, 2026, 2:40pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/8 "2026-01-05T14:40:56Z")

</div>

@vhuser

When submitting a request to the US NRC, you can add a comment in the summary field recommending that the concept be forwarded to the International CRS system. After submitting the request, you can follow the progress through the USCRS system and communicate your desire to have the request handled by the International release. It is the decision of the US extension manager to decide whether the request is suitable for forwarding. If the concept does end up in the extension, then you can request promotion by submitting another request (using the “other” category) along with evidence that the concept is required by another member.

I would think that your use case would support inclusion in the international release and if the request is documented sufficiently, there should be no problem.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vhuser](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/vhuser/32/323_2.png) [@vhuser](https://forums.snomed.org/u/vhuser)\
**Post date:** [April 10, 2026, 10:52pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/9 "2026-04-10T22:52:47Z")

</div>

Second batch of requests was made today.  
Feedback to SCT admins is:

Batch import helps (66 terms) but I was surprised that this is not the only step.  
It seems such step only imports them into the workbench and a submission is still required. That is fine but the error that says `only 50 items can be submitted at a time` is not good from user perspective. (I forgot to take screenshot of that message)  
So be prepared to make further 50 concept batches once batch request is imported into workbench.

If it helps others, it looks like this

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/uploads/snomed/original/1X/db32a50aabc06448f5103744698b19c3e22e72f1.png)

 ![image](https://europe1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/uploads/snomed/original/1X/8fa3ac9c8ace56f745819ed8b648c9b717a6e4be.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vhuser](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex014/user_avatar/forums.snomed.org/vhuser/32/323_2.png) [@vhuser](https://forums.snomed.org/u/vhuser)\
**Post date:** [May 19, 2026, 6:23pm UTC](https://forums.snomed.org/t/left-right-eye-and-wet-amd-and-laterality-in-general/504/10 "2026-05-19T18:23:23Z")

</div>

May 2026 update on the submission is posted on OHDSI forum.

> **[OMOP Vocabulary and diagnoses, laterality, ICD, SNOMED](https://forums.ohdsi.org/t/omop-vocabulary-and-diagnoses-laterality-icd-snomed/24653/8?u=vojtech_huser)**
>
> Here is update on acceptance. The second batch, by decision of the submission system staff, was routed to the international edition. (unlike the first submission). It is somewhat tricky to track the batch submission. I also suspect not all of it...
